Adams et al (2000) argue that emu meat is best marketed as a 'game animal' meat similar to duck and quail. that is to say, most people would not buy it at the supermarket, but might be willing to try it in a restaurant setting.
Their survey results suggest that the willingness of people to eat a new meat product, even in a fine dining context, is strongly affected by wider 'social acceptability'. And at the time of the study the social acceptability of eating emu was consider somewhat low. Based on its absence from restaurant menus (as far as I have observed) this still seems to be the case.
References:
- Adams, C.R., Hoover, L.C., Arnett. D.B. and Thomspon, L.D. (2000). Social acceptability's role in an expanded rational expectation model of intention to consume an innovative meat product in a restaurant setting. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 24, 252-262.
- Dingle, J.G. (1997). Emu and Ostrich production and its consequences for human nutrition. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia, 21, 37-43.
- Shao, C.H., Avens, J.S., Schmidt, G.R., Maga, J.A. (1999). Functional, sensory, and microbiological properties of restructured beef and emu steaks. Journal of Food Science, 64, 1052-1054.
No comments:
Post a Comment